Experience is often treated as leadership’s greatest asset. Years in senior roles are assumed to sharpen judgement, reduce mistakes and strengthen strategic confidence. In many cases, this is true. Yet in today’s fast-shifting economic and organisational environment, experience can quietly turn into a liability, one that limits perception, narrows choices and delays necessary change.
The risk does not lie in experience itself but in how it shapes decision-making over time. As leaders accumulate experience, they also accumulate patterns. What once worked becomes familiar and what is familiar begins to feel correct.
Over time, decisions stop being actively examined and start being repeated. The leader does not consciously resist change; rather, change fails to register as necessary. Past success becomes an internal benchmark against which all new options are measured and often dismissed. This dynamic is particularly visible in organisations led by highly experienced executives who have successfully navigated earlier phases of growth or stability.
Their decisions were once effective, even essential. But markets evolve, technologies shift and workforce expectations transform. The environment changes faster than the internal logic guiding leadership decisions.
What follows is not failure, but stagnation disguised as prudence. Paradoxically, the more experienced the leader, the harder it becomes to challenge these internal frameworks. Experience brings authority and authority reduces friction.
Teams adapt to leadership preferences. Data is filtered to align with established thinking. Alternative perspectives are softened or delayed. Over time, leaders receive confirmation, not contradiction. In this context, experience no longer informs judgement; it replaces it.
A common example appears in organisations that resist structural or cultural adjustments despite clear warning signs. Employee engagement declines. High performers leave quietly. Decision cycles are slow. Yet leadership insists that the organisation has “been through worse” and will “stabilise as before”. The assumption is not irrational; it is experiential.
The leader has seen recovery before, so recovery is expected again without recognising that the underlying conditions have fundamentally changed. The cost of this mindset is rarely immediate. Financial results may remain acceptable in the short term, reinforcing confidence in existing decisions. But the long-term impact accumulates: lost talent, reduced innovation and an organisation increasingly misaligned with its external reality.
By the time decline becomes visible, the opportunity for gradual correction has already passed. This is why experience becomes most dangerous when it is unexamined.
Effective leadership in complex environments requires not only knowledge but also cognitive flexibility, the ability to question one’s own assumptions, even when they are supported by years of success. Yet many leadership cultures equate confidence with certainty and decisiveness with consistency. Leaders are rewarded for appearing sure, not for expressing doubt. Over time, curiosity gives way to control.
In today’s economic climate, this approach is increasingly costly. Rapid technological advancement, artificial intelligence, shifting labour dynamics and geopolitical uncertainty demand adaptive thinking. Decisions rooted in past frameworks often struggle to respond to problems that did not previously exist. Experience, instead of guiding innovation, begins to constrain it.
The solution is not to devalue experience but to rebalance it. Experience should serve as context, not as a ceiling. Leaders who remain effective over time are those who treat experience as a reference point, not a rulebook. They actively invite challenges, test their assumptions and recognise when familiarity is shaping judgement more than evidence.
Ultimately, leadership maturity is not measured by how much one has seen, but by how willing one remains to see differently. In an era defined by uncertainty and acceleration, the most valuable leaders are not those with the longest track records but those with the greatest capacity to unlearn. Experience should sharpen perception, not close it. And when leaders fail to make that distinction, their greatest asset quietly becomes their greatest limitation.
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
