Cairo: A drone strike on the Egyptian port of Damietta, the first attack on the country since the US-Iran war broke out, could be a high-risk message for American interests everywhere in the Middle East, analysts say.
No party has claimed the strike on the Mediterranean port and Egypt has not assigned blame for the attack, which struck an American-owned and operated floating gas storage vessel.
Ansar Allah, who have imposed a Red Sea blockade on Saudi Arabia, have denied carrying out the attack, which raised fears for the only remaining safe maritime route for the world's largest crude producer.
According to analysts, the goal of the attack — regardless of who launched it — could be to drag Egypt into the conflict, after months of Cairo acting as one of few diplomatic channels between Iran and the US.
The port strike, the furthest afield from the Gulf since the war broke out, also marks a new milestone by crossing the Red Sea into the Mediterranean.
Damietta, a Mediterranean port, is more than 1,300 km away from Iran and 2,000 km from Yemen.
The precision strike caused fires on the US-owned Energos Winter storage and regasification vessel and the Greek-owned GasLog Salem tanker, which was moored alongside.
"The attack may have been calibrated to damage a United States-linked asset without killing Egyptians," King's College London professor Andreas Krieg said, though Cairo would not "find that distinction reassuring".
According to Royal United Services Institute analyst HA Hellyer, the distance means "it's unlikely that Iran would have struck Egypt directly from Iranian territory".
"A drone launched from the Lebanese coast could fly west over the eastern Mediterranean before turning south towards Egypt," Krieg said, enabling it to avoid both Israeli and Egyptian airspace.
But Cairo University political science professor Mustapha Kamel al Sayyid believes Hezbollah is "wiser" than to pick a fight with the largest Arab military.
While energy facilities elsewhere in the region have been hit by drones and missiles over the course of the United States and Israel's war on Iran, Egypt had so far been spared.
"I would not automatically interpret this as an attack on Egypt itself," Krieg said, adding the purpose was to "show that United States assets are vulnerable beyond the Gulf".
"For Egypt, this is a warning that neutrality does not guarantee immunity," Krieg added.
Wednesday's attack took place as the United States and Iran returned to hostilities following a brief lull -- an apparent message that Iran could disrupt global trade even farther than it has.
According to Hellyer, "that would mean that Iran's strategy is very high risk, with a lot of downsides for their security relationships".
"Cairo and others would see an attack by any Iranian-aligned group on Egyptian territory as a formidable escalation, and that won't go down well for the medium-to-long term at all for Tehran," said.
But, he said, it is possible Tehran's regional allies could have done so, via the Ansar Allah in Yemen or Iran-aligned militias in Iraq.
Ansar Allah-affiliated news agency Saba on Thursday said the "rumours" were "unfounded".
Iran's other powerful ally, Hezbollah in Lebanon, is closest to the port less than 400 km away.
Egypt has for months walked a diplomatic tightrope, keeping phone lines open with both Tehran and Washington.
It helped secure a ceasefire earlier this year and serves as a diplomatic channel between the US, Iran and powers in the region.
"Egypt is the only major power in the region that still adopts a near-neutral stance," Al Sayyid said, adding that "only Israel" benefits from a firmer Egyptian stance.
Egyptian ports have this year absorbed substantial trade rerouted form the Gulf, as major shipping companies have tried to avoid the Strait of Hormuz and the Gulf, according to data from risk intelligence firm Vortexa and ship tracker MarineTraffic. — AFP
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
