In most contemporary working environments, performance or innovation does not necessarily drive success. At other times, success is influenced by less obvious interpersonal techniques, with ingratiation being one of the most prevalent methods. In ordinary terms, ingratiation is the conscious application of flattery or assent in order to win over those in authority. Although it might seem harmless or even strategic, there are consequences to this action that are usually ignored.
Today, the employees are more conscious of the possible benefits of ingratiation. In such a way, by identifying with the opinion of the leaders or being praised, they can get improved performance appraisals, promotions, or career advancements. This strategy may appear as a quick-fix in competitive settings. Studies have indicated that this kind of behaviour is common and is usually viewed as an efficient manner of manoeuvring through the hierarchies in the workplace.
Though there is a cost attached to ingratiation, on the surface. To sustain this behaviour successfully, individuals must always control their behaviour and their emotions, and may have to appear in ways that are not fully authentic. This attempt can be exhausting to personal energy and diminish self-control. In the long term, employees who constantly use ingratiation can be subject to stress, exhaustion and even emotional burnout. Mentally and emotionally exhausted people tend to commit counterproductive behaviours like lying or lowering quality of work. That is, the same tactic that is meant to build a career can end up compromising personal well-being and professional integrity.
It also has a psychological toll. Highly ingratiating employees can start to feel resentment, either at themselves because of losing their genuineness, or at the leaders at whom they are attempting to ingratiate. This tension within may destroy self-esteem and job satisfaction. Meanwhile, leaders do not necessarily lack the knowledge of such tactics. In numerous instances, the flattery might be seen as artificial by the leaders, and thus it can destroy trust instead of establishing it, leading to a toxic work environment.
Ingratiation affects not just individuals but also the organisation. Leaders who have a high degree of agreement and compliments may be overconfident in their judgements. Inappropriate decisions may be unquestioned unless constructive criticism or honest feedback is provided. In the long run, such behaviour may result in poor strategies and negatively impact the overall performance of the organisation.
Additionally, a culture of condoning ingratiation is also one that may promote conformity rather than creativity. The employees may not be ready to present new ideas and raise their concerns because they may assume that resistance will have an adverse impact on their jobs. Such an environment discourages and demotivates innovation in the workplace.
With these difficulties, organisations have to make proactive efforts to counter the challenge. The introduction of fair and objective performance evaluation systems is one of the best solutions. Once employees are evaluated on the basis of specific objective criteria and not on subjective ones, then the motivation to take part in flattery will greatly decrease. Open systems ensure that merit, not external influences, determines success.
Employee well-being is another concern. Organisations need to recognise the emotional load that is most likely to be placed on the workers and support them by providing them with an equal workload and wellness programmes. By addressing the emotional exhaustion at a tender age, the employees will escape the habit of indulging in negative behaviour.
Leadership is a key element as well. The leaders can do this by encouraging open communication and valuing honest feedback to create an atmosphere in which employees can express their views openly. The promotion of honesty helps to shift the focus of the emphasis towards satisfying the individual in the role of authority, and to achieving significant results.
Finally, organisations need to consider the impact of cultural pressures, specifically, power- distance, which refers to the extent of tolerance for hierarchical variations. In high power-distance workplaces, ingratiation can be perceived as a natural action. Nevertheless, in these situations, one must not confuse respect and overly submissive behaviour.
To sum up, ingratiation is a common phenomenon. Though it could have short-term benefits, its long-term impacts are detrimental both to individuals and organisations. Identification of these insidious costs is the first step to a healthier, transparent and efficient workplace.
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
