Tuesday, April 21, 2026 | Dhu al-Qaadah 3, 1447 H
clear sky
weather
OMAN
22°C / 22°C
EDITOR IN CHIEF- ABDULLAH BIN SALIM AL SHUEILI
x
War is causing the biggest energy crisis in history: IEA
War costs France 4-6 billion euros so far: Minister
US and Iran warn they are ready for war as talks in limbo
War fuel hike adds $100 to long-haul flight cost, study says
US positive on Iran deal, but talks still uncertain
Oman condemns any plots targeting UAE’s security, stability
Blockade to continue until a deal is reached with Iran: Trump
Iran and Washington plan new talks in Pakistan
US has turned back 27 ships since the Hormuz blockade
Fate of Iran talks uncertain as ceasefire deadline approaches

The Muscat Model: Navigating the “subsurface” of science diplomacy

minus
plus

The formal study of science diplomacy rests on three pillars: science for diplomacy (advice informing policy), diplomacy for science (enabling bilateral or multilateral cooperation) and science in diplomacy (collaboration for improving relations). When we think of these, one imagines the International Space Station or CERN, as they are human brilliances in their own right.


Yet a fourth, more subtle pillar is emerging based on the case study of Oman. This emerging concept may be described as Mediatory Science Diplomacy.


Oman is historically synonymous with mediation, a trait certainly forged in its maritime DNA. For centuries, Omani ports were not merely locations where goods were exchanged; they were knowledge clearinghouses. A merchant from Gujarat and a trader from Zanzibar did not simply exchange spices; they exchanged navigational mathematics, botanical knowledge and maritime engineering. Such “Port Logic” created a culture of mutual benefit and intellectual trade.


This legacy transcends the pages of history. From ancient Egyptian medical exchanges to the Academy of Gundeshapur in Persia — the predecessor to Baghdad’s House of Wisdom — the sciences have always been a reliable diplomatic currency.


Yet, since modern academic literature on science diplomacy is newly amassed, this has left a conceptual gap concerning the specific role of the mediating state in scientific and technical exchanges.


In contemporary high-stakes international discussions involving deeply technical subject matter — from environmental monitoring to nuclear verification technologies — progress often depends not only on scientific expertise, but on the existence of a diplomatic environment that allows specialists to engage with one another in a sustained and depoliticised manner. In such contexts, the mediator’s role is not to shape the science itself, but to safeguard the conditions under which technical dialogue can occur. This involves cultivating trust, ensuring discretion and upholding the dignity of all participants, allowing experts to meet primarily as engineers, scientists and inspectors rather than as political adversaries.


Oman’s diplomatic tradition demonstrates that science diplomacy does not always require a laboratory. At times, the most powerful scientific instrument is a round table in a quiet room. By blending the ancient tradition of maritime mediation with the modern requirements of global technical governance, the Sultanate of Oman has shown that the diplomatic virtues of patience, neutrality and respect are precisely what is needed to navigate the uncharted technical waters of the future.


Much like ancient Omanis used the stars to navigate their dhows, the Muscat Model uses the fixed stars of neutrality and evidence to guide the world towards a horizon of cooperation and stability.


SHARE ARTICLE
arrow up
home icon