The United Nations chamber fell into symbolic silence, broken only by the shuffle of footsteps, as delegates rose from their seats and filed out during Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s speech. His pledge to “finish the job” in Gaza — words delivered with defiance — was met with visible rejection, a striking moment that captured the world’s growing disapproval.
That walkout crystallised a shift already well underway: Israel stands increasingly isolated as the humanitarian disaster in Gaza deepens.
The toll is staggering. More than 65,000 lives have been lost, entire neighbourhoods reduced to rubble, and vital infrastructure obliterated.
What began as a declared retaliatory operation has, in the eyes of governments, institutions, and global opinion, evolved into what many now call a campaign of genocide. This accusation is no longer confined to Israel’s adversaries; it reverberates in Western capitals, cultural circles, and humanitarian bodies, shaping an unprecedented crisis of legitimacy.
Politically, the reorientation is unmistakable. Nations once firm in their support now openly condemn Israeli actions. The recent recognition of a Palestinian state by the United Kingdom, France, Canada, Australia, Portugal and others would have seemed unthinkable just a few years ago.
Across Europe and North America, calls for arms embargoes and sanctions gather momentum, while in the United States — Israel’s closest ally — support is eroding, particularly among younger generations and within the Democratic Party. Netanyahu’s speech at the UN, meant to project resolve, instead underscored this unravelling consensus.
Institutional and legal pressure has grown equally intense. The United Nations has issued a series of sharp denunciations, with an independent commission concluding that Israel has committed genocide in Gaza — a finding supported by leading genocide scholars and human rights groups such as Amnesty International.
The International Criminal Court has issued arrest warrants for senior Israeli officials over alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity, while the International Court of Justice has declared Israel’s presence in the Occupied Palestinian Territory illegal. Even the sporting world has weighed in: UEFA has announced its intention to suspend Israel from international football, underlining how deeply the conflict has penetrated arenas once thought beyond the reach of geopolitics.
On the streets, public pressure is visible and growing. From London to Milan, vast demonstrations call for an immediate ceasefire and unrestricted humanitarian access. Social media has galvanised these movements, amplifying solidarity and creating counter-narratives to official discourse. Writers, artists and actors who once hesitated to speak out now lend their voices, signing open letters and endorsing cultural boycotts. Within Israel, protests have also gathered pace, reflecting rising frustration over the war’s toll and the fate of hostages.
Economic consequences mirror these shifts. The Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions campaign, long dismissed as fringe, has entered the mainstream.
Multinational brands such as McDonald’s and Starbucks have reported declining sales in several markets amid consumer boycotts. Institutional investors are also acting: Norway’s sovereign wealth fund has divested from Israeli companies, citing Gaza-related concerns. UN experts have called for an end to trade with what they describe as Israel’s 'economy of genocide,' adding further pressure.
Beneath these layers lies an unmistakable ethical reckoning.
The scale of Gaza’s suffering, captured and broadcast daily, has forced societies to confront the moral compromises that long defined the global response to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The endurance of Gaza’s population, facing unimaginable hardship with extraordinary dignity, has become both a symbol of human resilience and an indictment of the world’s inertia.
The walkout at the UN punctuated Netanyahu’s speech and carried a symbolism far beyond the chamber walls. It marked a broader shift in conscience and alliances, where Israel’s isolation now extends across diplomacy, law, culture and economics.
The silence of past decades weighed heavily on Gaza, yet the current wave of disillusionment signals a slow but irreversible rethinking.
It points towards a moment in which the principles of human rights and international law may be reclaimed as universal — and the suffering of any people, whatever their identity, can no longer be brushed aside.
Badr al Dhafari
The writer is head of proofreading and translation at Oman Observer
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
