In the course of history, seldom have been the moments when we pauses to recall and deeply analyse history or its invocation. In the recent military operations against Gaza, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's use of the analogy between the Amalekites and Hamas calls for such a moment. This intentional historical reference deserves a thorough examination to evaluate its significance and potential projection on the severity and duration of the atrocities being committed in Gaza.
Netanyahu used this analogy to shape the narrative and foster a sense of unity among the Israeli people. While we cannot ascertain Netanyahu's personal motivations, it may be argued that he aims to position himself as a defender of the nation, drawing parallels between his role and that of historic and biblical leaders like Moses (Peace BE Upon Him) and Joshua.
The analogy draws upon the ancient biblical account of the Amalekites and their hostility towards the Israelites during their journey in the desert. The story in Exodus recounts how Moses (PBUH) and Joshua led the Israelites into battle against this threatening force. The narrative resonates with the modern-day conflict, symbolizing the ongoing struggle faced by Israel against its enemies in more than one aspect.
Netanyahu's utilisation of the Amalek analogy serves several purposes. Perhaps most notably, it aims to forge a historical and cultural connection, reinforcing a collective memory of past trials and victories. By evoking the imagery of Moses (PBUH) and Joshua, he portrays himself as a strong and courageous leader, signaling his commitment to protecting the nation against external threats. Moreover, such an analogy will further entrenche the Palestinian-Israeli conflict in the common religious and cultural traditions of modern-day Israelis in order to transcend ideological differences that have prevailed recently.
As a result, this strategic narrative serves to foster a sense of solidarity among the Israeli people. By depicting Hamas as the contemporary embodiment of Amalek, Netanyahu aims to rally support and unite the nation against a common enemy. In addition, the reference to a shared historical struggle is an attempt to strengthen the bond between the government and its citizens, presenting a rallying point for national identity. Such a bond has been under tremendous pressure under his leadership.
However, it is essential to approach such comparisons with caution. Drawing historical analogies can be a powerful tool, but it also presents risks. Associating modern conflicts too closely with biblical narratives may oversimplify complex geopolitical realities, potentially hindering diplomatic efforts and perpetuating a cycle of violence. While this might have been an additional layer or motivation behind the strategic deployment of such analogy by Netanyahu, it most probable will fire back at him sooner or later. Oversimplification of geopolitical realities to mobilise the masses will most definitely render the internal political landscape unmanageable.
Israel, with or without Netanyahu, should pursue a just resolution for the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It is crucial for people of Israel to balance historical narratives with empathy, moral responsibility, and a commitment to peaceful coexistence. Only through a comprehensive understanding of the present realities, acknowledging the rights and aspirations of all parties involved, can a sustainable peace be achieved in the region.
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
