Friday, April 26, 2024 | Shawwal 16, 1445 H
clear sky
weather
OMAN
26°C / 26°C
EDITOR IN CHIEF- ABDULLAH BIN SALIM AL SHUEILI

At King Charles III’s coronation, everything olde was new again

British royal ceremonies are heavily choreographed affairs, their details designed to convey specific messages to the nation and to the world about what the monarchy stands for
King Charles returns to the balcony at Buckingham Palace to wave once more to his subjects after his coronation in London.
King Charles returns to the balcony at Buckingham Palace to wave once more to his subjects after his coronation in London.
minus
plus

The coronation of King Charles III was billed as a chance to usher in a new kind of monarchy — slimmer, more accessible and more inclusive — for the 21st century.


Although Saturday’s ceremony had its share of modern flourishes, it was hard to escape the sense that they were mostly tweaks to an ancient ritual which, like the monarchy itself, can’t escape the heavy burdens of the past.


As it happened, the coronation was a huge success by most measures. It proceeded on time and on schedule. No one dropped anything. Prince Harry came, saw and left, without apparent incident. Charles looked burdened, and then relieved, by the responsibility of it all; Queen Camilla looked radiant.


And Britain thrilled at the spectacle of Penny Mordaunt, the leader of the House of Commons, successfully wielding an 8-pound jewel-encrusted sword while wearing a blue dress-and-cape ensemble, like some sort of proud English Valkyrie.


(She was a big hit on social media.


“The Penny is mightier than the sword,” Chris Bryant, a Labour member of Parliament, tweeted.)


But it’s hard to use the word “modern” to describe a ceremony that included, among many other exotic elements, an ancient 350-pound rock from Scotland called the Stone of Destiny; a hollow gold “Sovereign’s orb” encrusted with emeralds, rubies and sapphires, resembling a magnificent Fabergé egg, topped by a cross; numerous embroidered robes and jewel-studded crowns; two golden monarch-conveying carriages; and thousands of people in elaborate military costumes processing like some sort of fancy-dress army along the vast Mall that runs between Trafalgar Square to Buckingham Palace.


British royal ceremonies — marriages, funerals and coronations — are of course heavily choreographed affairs, their details designed to convey specific messages to the nation and to the world about what the monarchy stands for.


The last coronation, Queen Elizabeth II’s, in 1953, felt like the final hurrah of an empire and served to elevate a young woman who, untested and full of promise, could only grow into the job.


Charles has had a lifetime to think about the sort of coronation he wanted, and it turned out that he had some very specific ideas.


He wanted the ceremony to include representatives from the world’s religions, not just the Church of England, and it did; he wanted it to include new pieces of music, sung by a range of performers, and it did.


The ceremony’s guest list included fewer hereditary peers and fewer people in highly formal attire, and more celebrities — including Katy Perry (dressed in a daringly low-cut pink suit and a massive hat), Lionel Richie and Emma Thompson.


And it included efforts to put modern flourishes on ancient traditions, though those were often subtly applied.


So Charles retained the custom by which the monarch, when anointed with oil by the Dean of Westminster, does so out of view, behind a special screen.


He used oil made from olives harvested from two groves in Jerusalem, employing the same formula used for his mother’s anointment.


But Charles also had a special anointing screen commissioned for the occasion, using “traditional and contemporary sustainable embroidery practices” to depict a tree reflecting his “deep affection for the Commonwealth,” the palace said.


In a reflection of the king’s love of nature, and of recycling, the screen was held up by oak wooden poles made by a “windblown tree from the Windsor Estate, which was originally planted by The Duke of Northumberland in 1765.” — The New York Times


The writer is an American journalist who has worked for NYT


SHARE ARTICLE
arrow up
home icon