Sunday, May 28, 2023 | Dhu al-Qaadah 7, 1444 H
clear sky
34°C / 34°C

Bolsonaro vs. Lula: Brazil faces radically opposed options


RIO DE JANEIRO — For the past decade, Brazil has lurched from one crisis to the next: environmental destruction, an economic recession, one president impeached, two presidents imprisoned, and a pandemic that killed more people than anywhere else outside the United States.

On Sunday, Brazilians will cast their ballots for their next president, hoping to push Latin America’s largest country toward a more stable and brighter future — by deciding between two men who are deeply tied to its tumultuous past.

The election is widely regarded as the nation’s most important vote in decades, historians in Brazil say, in part because the health of one of the world’s biggest democracies may be at stake.

The incumbent, President Jair Bolsonaro, is a far-right populist whose first term has stood out for its turmoil and his constant attacks on the electoral system. He has drawn outrage at home and concern abroad for policies that accelerated deforestation in the Amazon rainforest, for his embrace of unproven drugs over COVID-19 vaccines, and for his harsh attacks on political rivals, judges, journalists and health professionals.

The challenger, former President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, is a left-wing firebrand who oversaw Brazil’s boom during the first decade of this century, but then went to prison on corruption charges. Those charges were later thrown out, and now, after leading in polls for months, the man simply known as “Lula” is poised to complete a stunning political resurrection.

They are perhaps the two best-known, and most polarizing, figures in this nation of 217 million people, and for more than a year, they have been pitching voters on starkly different visions for the country, whose economy has been battered by the pandemic and global inflation.

Bolsonaro, 67, wants to sell Brazil’s state-owned oil company, open the Amazon to more mining, loosen regulations on guns and usher in more conservative values. Da Silva, 76, promises to raise taxes on the rich to expand services for the poor, including widening the social safety net, increasing the minimum wage, and feeding and housing more people.

Bolsonaro’s campaign slogan is “God, family, homeland and liberty,” while da Silva has built his pitch around a pledge to ensure that all Brazilians can enjoy three meals a day, including, occasionally, a top cut of meat and a cold beer at a family barbecue.

Yet, instead of their plans for the future, much of the race has revolved around each candidate’s past. Brazilians have lined up on either side based in large part on their opposition to one of the candidates, instead of their support for them.

“The major word in this campaign is ‘rejection,’” said Thiago de Aragão, strategy director at Arko Advice, one of Brazil’s largest political consultancies. “This election is a demonstration of how voters in a polarized country unify themselves around what they hate instead of what they love.”

The focus Sunday — when a total of 11 presidential candidates will be on the ballot — will not just be on the vote tallies, but also on what will happen after the results are announced.

Bolsonaro has been casting doubt on the security of Brazil’s electronic voting system for months, claiming without evidence that it is vulnerable to fraud and that da Silva’s supporters are planning to rig the vote. Bolsonaro has, in effect, said that the only way he would lose is if the election were stolen from him.

“We have three alternatives for me: prison, death or victory,” he told supporters at enormous rallies last year. “Tell the bastards I’ll never be arrested.”

Earlier this year, the military began challenging the election system alongside Bolsonaro, raising concerns that the armed forces could back the president if he refuses to concede.

But in recent weeks, the military and election officials agreed on a change to tests of the voting machines, and military leaders say they are now satisfied with the system’s security. The military would not support any efforts by Bolsonaro to challenge the results, according to two senior military officials who spoke anonymously because of rules against military officials discussing politics. Some senior generals have also recently tried to persuade Bolsonaro to concede if he loses, according to one of the officials.

Bolsonaro, however, still does not seem satisfied. On Wednesday, his political party released a two-page document claiming, without evidence, that some government employees and contractors had the “absolute power to manipulate election results without leaving a trace.” Election officials fired back that the claims “are false and dishonest” and “a clear attempt to hinder and disrupt” the election.

On Thursday, at the final debate before Sunday’s vote, Bolsonaro was asked directly by another candidate if he would accept the election results. He did not answer. Instead, he insulted the candidate, saying she was only challenging him because he fired her friends from government jobs. (She then asked if he was vaccinated for COVID-19 — his government deemed his vaccine status to be classified — and he responded similarly.)

Da Silva has held a commanding lead in the polls since last year. If no candidate exceeds 50% of the vote Sunday, the top two finishers will compete in a runoff on Oct. 30. It had appeared that Bolsonaro and da Silva would end up in another showdown then, but a recent surge in da Silva’s poll numbers suggests that he could win outright Sunday.

A victory for da Silva would continue a leftward shift in Latin America, with six of the region’s seven largest nations electing leftist leaders since 2018. It also would be a major blow to the global movement of right-wing populism that has spread in the last decade. Former President Donald Trump is a key ally of Bolsonaro and has endorsed the Brazilian president.

Polls suggest that if da Silva wins the presidency in Sunday’s first round, it would only be by a slim margin, creating an opening for Bolsonaro and his supporters to argue that voter fraud accounted for the results.

Political leaders and analysts believe that Brazil’s democratic institutions are prepared to withstand any effort by Bolsonaro to dispute the election’s results, but the nation is bracing for violence. Seventy-five percent of Bolsonaro’s supporters told Brazil’s most prominent pollster in July that they had “little” or no support for the voting systems.

“The only thing that can take victory from Bolsonaro is fraud,” said Luiz Sartorelli, 54, a software salesperson in São Paulo. He listed several conspiracy theories about past fraud as proof. “If you want peace, sometimes you need to prepare for war.”

The election could also have major global environmental consequences. Sixty percent of the Amazon lies within Brazil, and the health of the rainforest is critical to stemming global warming and preserving biodiversity.

Bolsonaro has loosened regulations on logging and mining in the Amazon, and slashed federal funds and staffing for the agencies that enforce laws intended to protect Indigenous populations and the environment.

In his campaign, he has promised to strictly enforce environmental regulations. At the same time, he has cast doubt on statistics that show soaring deforestation and has said that Brazil must be able to take advantage of its natural resources.

Da Silva has pledged to end all illegal mining and deforestation in the Amazon, and said that he would encourage farmers and ranchers to use unoccupied land that has already been deforested.

With a steady lead in the polls, da Silva has run an exceedingly risk-averse campaign. He has declined many interview requests and, last week, he skipped a debate.

But he did show up at Thursday’s debate, where Bolsonaro immediately started swinging. He called da Silva a “liar, ex-convict and traitor.” He claimed the left wanted to sexualize children and legalize drugs. And he tried to connect da Silva to a 20-year-old unsolved murder. “The future of the nation is at stake,” he told voters.

Da Silva said the president was lying. “You have a 10-year-old daughter watching this,” he said. “Be responsible.”

arrow up
home icon