Why Iran is in no rush to return to talks with US
Published: 05:07 AM,Jul 29,2026 | EDITED : 09:07 AM,Jul 29,2026
Iran’s skies have been free of the sound of explosions and airstrikes for the past several days, after a bout of renewed fighting with the United States. But Iranian officials say they have not agreed to a ceasefire and are in no hurry to hold direct talks with U.S. negotiators.
Instead, Iranian officials insist they are in a position of strength, military leaders boast of battlefield successes, and diplomats dismiss U.S. claims that they are eager to return to negotiations.
The rhetoric coming from Iran indicates that its leaders are comfortable with the state of limbo with the United States — something between peace and full-fledged war — believing they can handle renewed conflict and that they have leverage over President Donald Trump. The priority for Iran seems to be gaining recognition of its control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a concession that the United States has been unwilling to grant.
Despite the bluster, the uncertainty is a challenge for Iran, analysts say. Fighting could break out again at any time, a final settlement appears distant, and Iran’s economy is almost certain to deteriorate further because of instability, wartime destruction and a U.S. naval blockade.
Ramazan Sharif, a former spokesperson for Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, the ideological military force that has solidified its control over Iran during the war, said Sunday that Iran’s “enemy” had “faced strategic defeat at every step,” Iranian state media reported.
Iranian diplomats have reacted with more restraint to the pause in the fighting over the past few days, after two weeks of trading attacks. But there is little hint that they are in a mood for compromise.
“At present, what exists cannot be described as a ceasefire,” Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baghaei said at a news conference Monday.
Trump said on Monday that Iran had requested a pause to meet for talks and that the two sides were engaged in discussions.
“We’re talking right now,” he told reporters aboard Air Force One, adding that there was “a good chance” a new round of diplomacy with Iran could yield a breakthrough. Last week he said at the White House, “they want to meet desperately to try and end it.”
Baghaei denied that there were any current negotiations with the United States.
Iran faces stark internal divisions over its diplomatic contacts, with hard-liners opposed to resuming negotiations and denouncing the elected government, which has engaged in talks to pursue a ceasefire.
Iran’s negotiations, Baghaei said, were with Oman over management of the Strait of Hormuz, the critical waterway for oil and gas shipments that Iran effectively shut down after being attacked by the United States and Israel in late February.
“They believe that time is on their side, that they can absorb pain and pressure more successfully than Donald Trump can, and that ultimately he will agree to a deal that fits their demands without any concessions from their side,” said Gregory Brew, a senior analyst on Iran at the Eurasia Group, a political risk advisory firm.
The recent resumption of fighting caused oil prices to surge, raising gas prices for American consumers. Oil prices had fallen sharply after the United States and Iran paused their attacks.
Trump faces a painful dilemma in deciding his next step on Iran.
The New York Times reported Saturday that private U.S. deliberations over the war have focused on the Pentagon’s shrinking stockpiles of air-defense munitions, making a return to war high-risk. That is just one of several concerns for U.S. officials, along with the danger of a widening war, the effect on Gulf allies and global energy supplies.
It is difficult to know the state of Iran’s missile supplies, said Farzin Nadimi, a senior fellow with the Washington Institute and an expert on Iranian military affairs. Iran is believed to have produced between 700 and 1,000 solid-propellant ballistic missiles between the brief war with Israel in June 2025 and the outbreak of the current war, he said. Its output of liquid-fuel and cruise missiles is less quantifiable, he added.
Open-source information on Iran’s missile production can be fragmentary, Nadimi said. That opacity means that less is known about how Iran would fare in a return to full-blown war.
Still, Iran does not “want to return to a full-scale war that involves both the U.S. and Israel, and also one with open-ended prospects,” he said. Iranian officials have hinted in recent interviews that they agreed to the ceasefire partly because missile stocks were running low or were not fully accessible, he added.
Iran is at risk of overreaching, Brew said. For Trump, escalating the war could be more appealing than accepting a deal that gives Iran control over the strait, he added, and other countries are unlikely to accept tolls on ships. There is scope for both sides to de-escalate if Iran accepts a compromise arrangement regarding the waterway's future.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.