Welcome to the era of me-first energy

The months-long closure of the Strait of Hormuz is reinforcing an expensive geopolitical lesson about how risky it can be to rely on imported energy.
From South America to Southeast Asia, governments and private companies are being forced to look inward and take steps to harness what they can domestically, even when doing so raises upfront costs. Call it the era of me-first energy.
Guyana, a fast-growing South American oil producer that ran short of fuel this spring, is discussing building its first refinery. Indonesia is accelerating plans to harness more power from the sun. Many other Asian countries have turned to coal in order to plug their energy gaps, at least for now. And in Europe, Belgium is trying to nationalise nuclear energy.
Individuals are also taking matters into their own hands, buying electric vehicles to avoid rising fuel costs or installing rooftop solar panels to lower electricity bills. In the Philippines, which was especially hard hit after US-Israeli strikes on Iran started, imports of electric cars and solar equipment from China recently hit records, according to Ember, a London research group.
But countries and businesses can only do so much on their own. The world has developed a tightly interwoven energy system primarily because it is cheaper for countries to specialise in the commodities they have and the technologies where they have expertise — and to import what they lack.
Even the United States, the world’s biggest oil and natural gas producer, is not truly energy independent. It buys crude oil from Canada, Mexico and Venezuela while selling its own fuel to the rest of the world.
Still, each gallon of gasoline or kilowatt-hour of electricity available locally offers that much more of a buffer in the next war or shipping disruption.
“Countries will have a much more robust mix of things that they generate domestically and then a much more cautious eye to how they create trade relationships,” said Sarah Ladislaw, the founding director of the New Energy Industrial Strategy Center and a former adviser to President Joseph R. Biden Jr.
How drastic these reforms are will depend partly on how long the war with Iran lasts. The sooner it ends, the more likely it is that people will forget the pain of higher prices and shortages.
The oil shocks of the 1970s lifted fuel prices for more than a decade, remaking energy systems around the world. Countries invested in nuclear power, energy efficiency and more international cooperation, including collective efforts to stockpile oil.
Later, oil prices rose for about six months around the Arabian Gulf war of 1991 but did not reshape the global energy map, said Claudio Galimberti, chief economist for the research firm Rystad Energy.
A few things suggest that the war with Iran could leave a bigger mark. For one, it has wiped out more supply than any prior crisis. There are also many more alternatives to oil and gas available today than in the past. And because this upheaval comes on the heels of Russia’s 2022 attack of Ukraine, the lessons are more likely to stick, said David Goldwyn, a former US diplomat and Energy Department official.
“That much crisis in that short a time forces countries to rethink their energy security strategies for economic and national security reasons.” In the Philippines, which in 2024 relied on Arabian Gulf countries for about a quarter of its imported oil and natural gas, the closure of Hormuz appeared to be accelerating the transition toward renewable energy.
The value of solar equipment that China exported to the Philippines hit a record of almost $300 million in March — more than double the previous monthly record — before a Chinese tax rebate expired on April 1, Ember data show.
The war has also made solar power a bigger national priority in neighbouring Indonesia. “God willing, we will eliminate our dependence on imported fuel and save valuable foreign exchange reserves,” the country’s president, Prabowo Subianto, said in May.
Elsewhere, many behavioural and policy changes are extensions of the last energy shock, when Europe realised that its reliance on natural gas from Russia had made it incredibly vulnerable to the whims of the country’s president, Vladimir V. Putin.
After Russia abruptly cut off gas supplies, forcing Europeans to pay much higher prices, many governments further embraced renewable energy. Europe’s gas consumption is about 16 per cent lower than before Russia began its war, according to International Energy Agency estimates.
Now, countries are doing more to preserve domestic energy resources. Belgium, which was among the biggest European buyers of natural gas from the Arabian Gulf, is negotiating to buy the country’s last two operating nuclear power plants, as well as several others that have shut down.
Nuclear power is also seeing a resurgence in Asia, including Taiwan, where the governing party effectively withdrew its opposition to the technology.
A big distinction between this energy shock and the last one is that the war with Iran has mostly affected the flow of oil and fuels needed to drive and fly, whereas the 2022 crisis was largely about natural gas and electricity.
Soaring electric car sales in much of the world have been among the clearest signs that the war may hasten a shift away from oil. China, the world’s leading manufacturer of such models, exported a record $9.1 billion worth of electric and plug-in hybrid vehicles in April, up more than 50 per cent year-over-year, according to Ember. Exports to countries hit hard by the loss of Arabian Gulf oil supplies, including Japan, Pakistan and India, were especially strong.
Oil producers are also looking to make changes. Kuwait, which has hardly been able to export any oil because of the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, wants to build more storage capacity abroad, outside the shipping choke point. And many countries across the Middle East are exploring building or expanding pipelines that would avoid the strait.