Thursday, March 28, 2024 | Ramadan 17, 1445 H
broken clouds
weather
OMAN
23°C / 23°C
EDITOR IN CHIEF- ABDULLAH BIN SALIM AL SHUEILI

Ex-judge to probe conspiracy angle in CJI harassment charge

1202284
1202284
minus
plus

New Delhi: In a major development, the Supreme Court on Thursday ordered a probe by a former judge of the apex court, Justice A K Patnaik, into allegations about conspiracy against Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi who has been accused of sexual harassment by a woman.


The top court also directed the Directors of the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Intelligence Bureau (IB) besides the Delhi Police Commissioner to cooperate with Justice Patnaik as and when required.


The court gave the directions during a hearing on an affidavit filed by advocate Utsav Bains, who has alleged a conspiracy against the chief justice after a former Supreme Court staffer alleged sexual harassment.


Justice Patnaik, after completing his probe, shall file the report before the bench in a sealed cover, the top court said. It said the case will be listed after J Patnaik files his report.


The bench also said that the inquiry shall not affect the proceedings of the Supreme Court.


While ordering the inquiry, the court said Bains would be bound to disclose all documents. Earlier, Bains had claimed that he had sensitive information that cannot be disclosed.


Senior advocate Indira Jaising, while speaking to reporters after the order, said the chief justice cannot be the master of the roster anymore and that his administrative and judicial work should be suspended till the allegations against him are looked into.


She added that all the former staffers of the SC are witnesses in the case and questioned how the chief justice, being their ex-boss, could continue in this scenario.


Earlier, during the hearing by a bench headed by Justice Arun Mishra, Jaising asked the court to probe the credentials of Utsav Bains, saying people who come to court, must come with clean hands.


She said the bench is heavily consumed in probing the defence of the chief justice.


She contended that such influence on the investigation would prejudice the complaint by the former staffer of the top court against the chief justice.


The bench assured her that the investigation would be independent.


Solicitor General Tushar Mehta intervened by recommending the formation of an SIT, but Jaising protested and requested the court to conduct a judicial inquiry.


As per the Solicitor General’s suggestion regarding the formation of SIT into the matter, the bench said, “We can look into this aspect of investigation.” The court also clarified that this probe would not prejudice the complaint made by the woman against the chief justice.


The bench told Mehta that this is a very serious matter, and “we want to get to the root of this bench fixing issue, and the issue is so serious that we cannot divulge the details.”


The bench observed that some fixer who claims to be a relative of the woman, who levelled charges against the chief justice, approached


Utsav Bains for removal of the Chief Justice.


“We don’t know the identity of this person....we need to find out the truth,” said the bench. — IANS


SHARE ARTICLE
arrow up
home icon