Thursday, April 25, 2024 | Shawwal 15, 1445 H
clear sky
weather
OMAN
27°C / 27°C
EDITOR IN CHIEF- ABDULLAH BIN SALIM AL SHUEILI

Commonwealth Bank profit falls on scandal costs

1244048
1244048
minus
plus

Australia’s biggest bank, the Commonwealth, had put aside Aus$ 375 million ($296 million) to pay potential fines from a money-laundering scandal as it posted a slide in half-year profit. The lender also booked a Aus$ 200 million provision to cover a series of compliance and compensation costs it may face, including those that could stem from an upcoming government inquiry into the financial industry.


For the six months to December 31, it recorded a 0.7 per cent fall in cash profit, including the provisions, to Aus$ 4.87 billion from the year before, slightly below expectations.


Statutory net profit came in at Aus$ 4.9 billion, with a Aus$2.0 interim dividend announced.


The firm’s shares ended 0.79 per cent lower at Aus$ 76.79.


The bank has been under intense scrutiny by Australia’s financial intelligence agency AUSTRAC, with allegations it engaged in “serious and systemic non-compliance” of anti-money laundering laws involving thousands of transactions.


In December, it admitted more than 50,000 breaches, blaming a “systems-related error”, but said it would defend a host of other claims against it.


The Aus$ 375 million set aside was “a reliable estimate of the level of penalty that a court may impose”, the bank said, after taking legal advice.


Last month it was also taken to court by the country’s corporate watchdog over allegations it rigged the benchmark interest rate.


The Australian Securities and Investments Commission has claimed the lender engaged in “unconscionable conduct and market manipulation” when setting the bank bill swap reference rate (BBSW) in 2012.


The BBSW is a benchmark used to set the price of Australian financial products such as bonds and loans.


“The market is likely to look upon these regulatory provisions as one-off costs,” said CMC Markets analyst Ric Spooner.


“It is very difficult to know what penalties the courts will impose for the AUSTRAC breaches.


However, CBA’s provisions are based on research and legal advice and are far less than some of the most pessimistic expectations.”


Retiring chief executive Ian Narev said during the six months “we have focused a great deal of effort on fixing our mistakes, and becoming a better bank”.


“We have taken a significant provision for regulatory and compliance costs, consistent with accounting standards,” he added.


“We have also taken a Aus$ 375 million expense provision which we believe to be a reliable estimate of the civil penalty a court may impose in the AUSTRAC proceedings.


“We recognise, and regret, that these costs arise from our failure to meet some standards that we should have. We will continue to work hard to do better.” — AFP


SHARE ARTICLE
arrow up
home icon