Thursday, March 28, 2024 | Ramadan 17, 1445 H
broken clouds
weather
OMAN
23°C / 23°C
EDITOR IN CHIEF- ABDULLAH BIN SALIM AL SHUEILI

Beslan siege: European court finds serious failings by Russian govt

983387
983387
minus
plus

Strasbourg, France: The European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) ruled on Thursday there were “serious failings” in Russia’s handling of the Beslan school siege by Chechen rebels in 2004 in which over 330 people were killed, many of them children.


The court said although Russian authorities had information that an attack was being planned on a school in North Ossetia, they failed to do enough to disrupt the plot and had not sufficiently protected the hostages.


Russia reacted furiously to the judgement, saying it was “absolutely unacceptable”.


The Russian justice ministry announced plans to challenge the ruling to a higher chamber of the ECHR, arguing that a number of the court’s conclusions were “not backed up.”


The school was stormed on September 1, 2004 by militants demanding the withdrawal of Russian troops from the war-torn republic of Chechnya.


The attackers herded 1,100 people including 800 children into a gymnasium and rigged the building with explosives. After three days of fruitless negotiations, explosions in the school prompted Russian security forces to storm the gymnasium.


A total of 184 children were among the 334 dead as the siege came to a bloody end. Russian authorities argue they took the best course of action faced with armed extremists, but many of the survivors and their relatives believe the security services were to blame for the firefight.


The case was brought to the Strasbourg-based court by more than 400 Russians either involved in the incident or whose relatives were taken hostage or killed.


“The authorities had been in possession of sufficiently specific information of a planned terrorist attack in the area, linked to an educational institution,” the court said.


“Nevertheless, not enough had been done to disrupt the terrorists meeting and preparing.”


The judges found that “insufficient steps had been taken to prevent (the attackers) travelling on the day of the attack; security at the school had not been increased; and neither the school nor the public had been warned of the threat”. — AFP


SHARE ARTICLE
arrow up
home icon