TOKYO: Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe’s signature shock-and-awe ‘Abenomics’ stimulus strategy was already faltering even before his decision on Friday to step down due to health reasons.
That blunt assessment by many Japan observers underlined the daunting political challenge Abe has faced in his efforts to pull the economy out of decades of economic stagnation.
And the coronavirus crisis may have just put the final nail in the coffin to his ‘three arrows’ reform programme as the economy sinks deeper into recession, analysts say.
After sweeping to power in late 2012, Abe deployed his three arrows of Abenomics — large-scale monetary easing, fiscal spending and structural reforms — to reignite the world’s third biggest economy after years of subpar growth and falling prices.
There were some quick-hit successes.
The Bank of Japan’s “bazooka” stimulus programme lifted business sentiment and helped weaken the yen, giving exporters windfall profits that trickled down to wages and new jobs.
Corporate governance reforms drew in huge amounts of overseas money, pushing up foreign ownership of Japan’s listed stocks to a record 31.7 per cent in 2014 from 28 per cent in 2012. It stood at 29.6 per cent in 2019.
“We were able to end 20 years of deflation with the three arrows of Abenomics,” the prime minister told a news conference on Friday announcing his resignation, when asked what he thought were his legacies.
But Abe will leave behind a pile of unfinished business for his successor.
“The focus at the moment will be on the coronavirus recovery and controlling the infection, regardless of who will be the next prime minister,” said Takeshi Minami, chief economist at Norinchukin Research Institute.
“There has been talk that Abenomics has been having a harmful impact, so I think the focal point will be on suggestions how to make changes to it.”
The biggest disappointment for the prime minister, and many Japan observers, is that the third-arrow reforms to reshape an economy hobbled by low productivity, a rapidly ageing population and a rigid labour market, have proved elusive.
“Abenomics has singularly failed to deliver Japan the domestic conditions that would spark higher growth beyond more reliance on external demand,” said Brian Kelly, Managing Partner at Asian Century Quest.
Now, Japan is paying the price as COVID-19 wipes out the short-term benefits brought by Abenomics, such as an inbound tourism boom, reflated growth and rising job availability.
Abe’s failure to entice companies to spend more on capital expenditure has given Japan Inc a huge cash-pile that served as a liquidity buffer to weather the pandemic’s shock.
But the experience may give firms an excuse to keep hoarding cash rather than spend on new business opportunities, which could stifle innovation and weigh on Japan’s potential growth — factors Abe was focused on addressing through the third arrow.
“COVID-19 may have reassured corporate executives that cash is indeed king,” said Hideo Hayakawa, a senior fellow at the Tokyo Foundation for Policy Research. “My fear is that companies may feel even more inclined to save rather than spend.”
Social distancing policies and other business constrains to contain the virus may cripple potential growth — already low due to slow progress in deregulating highly-protected medical and agriculture industries, and accepting more foreign workers to address chronic labour shortages.
Japan’s potential growth rate, which used to exceed 4 per cent in the 1980s, slid near zero last year from around 1 per cent before Abenomics began, according to BoJ estimates.
“Structural reform, or the third arrow, has been the declaring failure of Abenomics,” said Samuel Tombs, chief UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics. “Even the government’s signature immigration reform last year was much ado about nothing, in practice.” — Reuters